(REVIEW) Resident Evil Requiem is a REturn to Greatness

by Gamatroid 🕹️ 

 

A new era of survival horror arrives with Resident Evil Requiem, the ninth title in the mainline Resident Evil series. Experience terrifying survival horror with FBI analyst Grace Ashcroft, and dive into pulse-pounding action with legendary agent Leon S. Kennedy. Both of their journeys and unique gameplay styles intertwine into a heart-stopping, emotional experience that will chill you to your core.

 GAME FACTS

• TITLE: Resident Evil Requiem
• RELEASE DATE: 2/27/2026
• MSRP: $69.99
• DEVELOPER: Capcom
• PUBLISHER: Capcom
• PLATFORMS: Xbox, PlayStation, Switch 2 and PC
• PLAYED ON: PlayStation 5

 

Experience the series' classic survival horror through combat, investigations, puzzles and resource management. Gameplay allows you to freely switch between first and third-person views to face the horrors in a way that suits your playstyle.

 

RETRO ROOTS

Resident Evil started way back on the very first PlayStation, and it was the reason I had to get a PS1. Most games before that weren't truly scary, and I was more than ready for the next generation of more mature games.

Resident Evil Requiem is the latest entry in this long running game series, and incorporates a lot of features that intend to bring the series back to its roots. One feature, is the game's inclusion of "mansion-like" environments in a clear nod to the original Spencer Mansion in Resident Evil 1. (I didn't see any dogs jump through windows, but Requiem has it's own share of jump scares.)

The original Resident Evil was cheesy like an 80s horror movie, but it was also creepy, bloody and more mature than anything else we had seen to that point. Gamers who had grown up playing since childhood were now in their teen years, or older, and were more than ready for something less childish.

Check out the image below of the review scores EGM gave it back in the day. Almost everyone loved the first Resident Evil. Only "Andy" seemed to have any issues, and clearly he was a Nintendo fan boy from his Mario RPG review, so what can you expect?

REVIEW

Gameplay & Mechanics

The gameplay is defined by its dual-protagonist system, featuring the seasoned Leon S. Kennedy and the newcomer Grace Ashcroft. This structure creates a compelling mechanical rhythm; while Leon’s segments lean into the refined, kinetic third-person combat seen in the Resident Evil 4 remake, complete with tactical parries and a new, weightier hatchet mechanic, Grace’s chapters pivot toward a tense, first-person survival experience. Her lack of military training necessitates a reliance on environmental manipulation, stealth, and the innovative "Blood Collector" system to manage the terrifyingly persistent Blister Heads. 

Controls feel exceptionally responsive across both perspectives, allowing for fluid movement that never sacrifices the "heft" necessary for horror. The balance of challenge is finely tuned, rewarding players who master the parry timing or the intricacies of the hemolytic injector crafting loop. With various difficulty modes and a plethora of post-game unlocks, the game offers substantial replay value that encourages multiple runs to optimize routes and uncover every secret. 

Visuals & Art Direction 

Resident Evil Requiem is damn beautiful to look at. Visually, the RE Engine continues to push boundaries, delivering a hauntingly beautiful presentation of the Rhodes Hill Chronic Care Center. The technical quality is staggering, with next-level environmental persistence and visceral gore effects that make every encounter feel impactful. 

The art direction leans heavily into the franchise's gothic and industrial roots, using a muted, oppressive color palette that heightens the sense of dread in the derelict hospital wings. This aesthetic is perfectly complemented by the narrative, which serves as a poignant "requiem" for the series' history. 

Story & Narrative

The story is surprisingly emotional, focusing on Grace’s personal search for her mother, Alyssa Ashcroft, while Leon grapples with his own trauma as he hunts the shadowy Victor Gideon. The dialogue feels more grounded and less campy than previous entries, though Leon’s signature wit remains intact, delivered through cinematic cutscenes that are as polished as the gameplay itself.

 

Audio & Music

The immersion is further deepened by a stellar audio design that turns every creaking floorboard or distant, muffled breath into a threat. The musical score is atmospheric and adaptive, swelling during Leon’s bombastic set pieces and receding into a minimalist, unnerving hum during Grace’s more vulnerable moments. 

Technical Performance

On a technical level, the game is remarkably stable, featuring near-instant load times and high-performance modes that maintain a rock-solid 60fps even during complex boss fights. The user interface remains clean and intuitive, ensuring that inventory management, a series staple, never feels like a chore. 

Innovation & Originality

While the game largely relies on perfected versions of existing mechanics, its innovation lies in how seamlessly it weaves these disparate styles together, setting a new industry standard for dual-protagonist narratives. 

Value vs Price

Even at $69.99, given the density of the 12-hour campaign and the high quality of the production, Resident Evil Requiem offers immense value for its price, standing as a polished, definitive celebration of survival horror. No reason to wait on a sale for this one. Just go get it! 

VERDICT

Resident Evil Requiem is a return to form for the series, which had found great success in its recent Ethan Winters entries, but had gotten away from the core characters we know and love. After the disaster that was Resident Evil 6, and the side stories explored in 7 and 8, it's great to see Leon, the T-Virus and Raccoon City return in such a splendid way. Grace is a great character as well, balancing vulnerability with effectiveness in a way that almost makes me forget about the disaster that was Ashley in Resident Evil 4 (almost). Resident Evil Requiem is sure to please both series veterans and newcomers alike. I'm glad to see Capcom return the series to greatness, and makes me eager to see where they go next.

Critic Consensus

• 9/10 - Gamatroid
• 9/10 - IGN
• 8/10 - GameSpot
• 9.2/10 - PC Gamer (92/100 raw score)
• 9.75/10 - Game Informer
• 9.5/10 - Destructoid

You can watch my beginning gameplay on PS5 in the YouTube video below:

You can read about how our reviews work here. 

Enter A.I.sha - Xbox's Next Chapter Will Be All About AI

by Gamatroid 🕹️ 

Ok, I thought I had said all I had to say on the topic of Microsoft Gaming / Xbox's new CEO, Asha Sharma, but then I heard the recent Podcast Unlocked episode from IGN, and some of the discussion was so... optimistic, I felt compelled to point out a few things about Asha's appointment (although I think they were trying to be optimistic and had the best intentions in how they led their discussion).

Just to recap, on Friday, February 20th, Microsoft announced that Phil Spencer was retiring and Asha Sharma would be the new head of Microsoft Gaming. Prior to her new role, Asha was most recently head of Microsoft's CoreAI division, tasked with putting Copilot in as many places as possible. 

Now she's Xbox's new CEO. Coincidence? Not on your life.

Microsoft is sending a very clear message about the future of their gaming endeavors, and while we don't know exactly how it will play out, AI is certain to have a front row seat.

That's the only reason they would put a non-gamer, AI executive, in the captain's chair. There is no other reason.

Just to level set, if it needs to be said, being CEO of Microsoft Gaming is a big deal. It's a top CEO job, and probably highly sought after. You don't get a job like that by mistake. There were a ton of qualified candidates. Microsoft could have even chosen to poach someone from Sony if they thought PlayStation had a winning playbook. Or they could have elevated someone within the current Xbox team. Or they could have hired from any number of places for that role. Believe me, almost anyone would have jumped at the chance. But they gave it to someone who isn't from gaming (that's clue number 1) and someone who is all about AI (that's clue number 2). Cyberdyne's (oh sorry, Microsoft's) message couldn't be clearer.

I'm not a doomer. I just like to make fun of AI using images from Terminator.

AI will be an integral part of the next generation of Microsoft gaming.

If you're wondering what AI integrated into hardware looks like, check out this AI-enabled PC article from Microsoft.

This could be the reason we see a new Xbox sooner rather than later from Microsoft. It didn't integrate AI into the hardware of the Series consoles, but you can bet they will in the next generation, whether we get a meaningful boost in power for gaming or not.

But this isn't really news for anyone who's been paying attention to what's been happening in tech and AI in general. 

AI is the next frontier and every tech company is chasing it. Just last year, Microsoft invested roughly $80 billion into data centers. Just to put that into perspective, the Activision/Blizzard acquisition was $68.7 billion. Where do you think their priorities are?

So AI is a given. It's coming whether we like it or not, and A.I.sha is the perfect CEO to cram AI into the next generation of Xbox consoles and the Microsoft Gaming ecosystem.

But it was coming no matter what, and I don't say this meaning to throw any shade at Asha. She might do an amazing job and truly help usher in the next great generation of Xbox. But trying to pretend AI won't be front and center in the next generation is silly. That would have happened regardless of who the next CEO was.

So how could A.I. being integrated into Microsoft Gaming and the next generation of Xbox hardware look like?

I have some thoughts...

I can see at least 3 key areas where AI could realistically be utilized in the next console generation:

1. Game development - traditional
2. Game engine rendering
3. Game dialogue generation

What do I mean? Let's briefly dive into each one.

A.I. in traditional Game Development

Like it or not, AI can be used in a variety of ways to speed along asset development for traditional games (I'll get into the distinction of what is tradition versus not in a moment). It can be used to:

• generate textures and select in-game scenery
• write draft outlines of certain game scenarios
• refine drafts of game dialog
• write game dialog
• generate certain sound effects and select spoken in-game dialog

This of it like A.I. being used to generate all the background, NPC, not core assets used in a video game. For the foreseeable future I see core, important aspects of game development staying human-generated. For example:

• Core game character dialog and voice acting
• Core game character models and textures
• Core environment design and texture mapping
• Overall game script and roadmap

Basically, all the most important aspects of a game, the things core to the overall experience, will likely continue to be human made for the next generation, but all the ancillary things that are kind of just in the background or used to fill out a game environment, but wouldn't have had a lot of time spent on them anyways, will start to be more and more AI generated.

And sadly, this will result in work-force reductions. Not because they have to happen, or because the people don't have value to add in other parts of a game's production, or that they could then spend even more time on the human-generated parts of the games, but they won't. There is a general expectation that the introduction of A.I. will result in workforce reductions, like there is an expectation when two companies join together that there will be "synergies" and work force reductions. Do there have to be? No. But there will be.

A.I. in Game Engine Rendering

Another area I can see A.I. immediately helping with is direct rendering of environments and assets inside of a game engine, on the fly. Imagine a game like Minecraft, that is already procedurally generated. It creates new game worlds each time you begin, based on rules that its designers created. Now, what if, you had a game like that, but instead of the same rulesets being designed in advance, an A.I. engine had a set of parameters to follow and created new game worlds on the fly as you entered them? What if every tree texture in Minecraft had slight variations so that they didn't all look like cookie cutter elements? What if enemies and NPCs had slight variations so that no two looked identical, but it all mostly still looked like the Minecraft you know and love. A.I. can basically help with that today, and I'm assuming if you built A.I. into the hardware itself, that could run some of these game engine renderings locally, although you might not need to.

Now imagine this in a game where an entire library of base game assets had been created by a human designer, and now A.I. simply iterates on what has been created to produce variations in the game world. In theory, no two NPCs would need to look the same. 

In theory this could be cool, but in practice we'll have to see what kinds of experiences are created. 

A.I. in Game Dialog Generation

Similar to the idea of Game Engine Rendering, game dialog could also be rendered by A.I. real-time as you interact with an environment. Ideally, human writers would create a base script and a lot of samples of dialog for the A.I. to build off of, but then while you are playing the game, it would create unique dialog based on the character you are interacting with and the evens that have occurred in the game so far. This could truly create a different experience for every person playing a game, and create a different experience every time you went back to play a game. Sure, the story would be the same overall, but the unique aspects of character dialog would be slightly different each time. 

Maybe you think this sounds great, or maybe you think it sounds awful and terrifying, but I can definitely see it coming.

I'm sure there are a lot of other areas A.I. could be used in game creation and generation, but based on my own experience, these are the areas I can practically see it working in the near term.

Ideally, all of this will lead to shorter development cycles, lower costs, and faster game releases. This is practically an expectation, and I'm sure Microsoft Gaming will do everything in its ability to ensure it happens. 

So in the end, A.I. is coming to Xbox whether we want it or not. There will be more job destruction along the way, and likely some slop we'll have to put up with in the near term. We'll just have to see exactly how it all plays out.

(REVIEW) Console Archives: Ninja Gaiden II The Dark Sword of Chaos

by Gamatroid 🕹️ 

 

And once again, the battle of the Dragon Ninja begins... "NINJA GAIDEN II: THE DARK SWORD OF CHAOS" was released by TECMO in 1990 for an 8-bit home console. In this side-scrolling action game, the Dragon Ninja, Ryu Hayabusa, fights with his clan's legendary Dragon Sword against Ashtar and his Sword of Chaos to stop the resurrection of an evil god.

 

 GAME FACTS

• TITLE: Console Archives: Ninja Gaiden II
• RELEASE DATE: 2/5/2026
• MSRP: $7.99
• DEVELOPER: HAMSTER
• PUBLISHER: HAMSTER
• PLATFORMS: PlayStation and Switch
• PLAYED ON: PlayStation 5

 

 

The title gained worldwide popularity for the thrill of conquering demanding stages with ninja actions, combined with cinematic "Tecmo Theater" cutscenes that look just like a movie.

 

 

 

Gameplay revolves around a 2D cinematic puzzle-platformer structure with no traditional side-scrolling. Progression occurs screen-by-screen, often requiring leaps of faith between static scenes. The core loop combines precise platforming (jumping, climbing, grabbing ledges), environmental puzzles (manipulating valves, lifts, steam vents), high-tension chase sequences from robotic enemies, and hacking mechanics. 

 

 

 

RETRO ROOTS

Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos was originally released for the Nintendo Entertainment System in May 1990 in North America (slightly earlier in Japan). 

I can't recall when I first played it, but I think it must have been a rental. I remember falling in love with the cutscenes and the overall story. I swear I had the Nintendo Power strategy guide at some point, but I don't have it anymore.

I remember the actual gameplay being fairly painful and very difficult, but I loved the cutscenes so much I would put up with the rest of the game in order to unlock the next part of the story.

All these years later though, I love the game itself too, although I still love the cutscenes more.

But I wasn't the only one who loved it. Critics were also in love with Ninja Gaiden II. Just look at the below review from EGM back in the day:

REVIEW

This is a critique of the overall quality and accuracy of the game port, not the original game itself. 

Gameplay & Mechanics

Mostly the controls work just as you would expect, with a slight lag to the input that is common in many emulations of classic games. Not terrible mind you, but not as snappy as the original NES interface (I went back to play my original NES version just to verify). But if you haven't played an original NES in a while you won't notice the difference.

 

Visuals & Art Direction 

If you've ever played an Arcade Archives release, you know what to expect from the various screen filters. The "A" set of filters apply varying degrees of blurring and scanlines, while the "B" filters also apply scanbars, which I really don't enjoy. I think I tend to stick to either the A2 or A3 filter, if that helps narrow it down for you. Other than the filters, everything else look accurate.

Story & Narrative

No changes here. All is just as great as the original you know and love.

 

Audio & Music

Audio is mostly exactly as you remember it, except... there is an audio channel that is oddly more pronounced in this release than in any other release I've played, including online emulation, and it also sounds slightly different than the NES original. I play this game a lot though, so I immediately picked up on it. If you haven't played in quite a while you likely won't even notice.

Technical Performance

From what I can tell the game performs amazingly, with all the same flicker and slow down you experienced in the NES original. Trust me this is a good thing.

 

Innovation & Originality

As far as originality for an emulation release, all of the Arcade (and now Console) Archive games seem pretty lacking in this regard to me. I would never expect an Atari 50 Digital Eclipse-style treatment for every game released, but including scans of actual manuals instead of simple onscreen text would be nice, as would scans of the original box art and other little touches like that. Other than the standard scanline filters, and common QoL stuff like save states, this is a pretty straightforward release. Not bad mind you, but not pushing the envelope either.

  

Value vs Price

For $7.99, the game feels a bit barebones. For full price you still get one of the greatest games ever released on the NES, and you also get the Japanese version as well (although the game is virtually identical except you can't understand the text in the cutscenes). I certainly think the game's full price is at the top of what they should be able to charge for games like this, but if you aren't dying to play the game immediately you might wait for a sale. To me, it's a much better bargain at $4.99 or below (although I did pay full price for it.)

VERDICT

For one of the very first Console Archive releases, Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos is certainly a competent release. Everything is just as you would expect if you ever played an Arcade Archives release.

The retail price is just a bit higher than I would feel comfortable with, given the barebones nature of this release, but that's a small complaint. 

The only thing that's a bit strange is that accentuated audio channel that doesn't sound like that in any other release of the game I've played. Honestly I forgot about it after playing for a bit, but if you play other versions of it regularly, you will likely notice it right away. Not terrible mind you, but just odd that it's not 100% accurate. Maybe they'll patch it out one of these days. 

Overall, this is one of the greatest video games ever made, and if you don't have another way to play it, you should pick this up.

You can watch my beginning gameplay, and a brief walkthrough of the menu options, of Console Archives - Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos on PS5 in the YouTube video below:

You can read about how our reviews work here. 

My Hope for the New Era of Xbox

by Gamatroid 🕹️ 

 

Well that’s it. Phil is out and AI is in, or should I say, the former head of Microsoft’s Core AI product is in… the CEO chair for Microsoft Gaming. 

On Friday, February 20th, Microsoft announced that Phil Spencer was retiring and Asha Sharma would be the new head of Microsoft Gaming.

Prior to her new gig, Asha was head of Microsoft’s CoreAI product, and prior to that she was COO at Instacart and something over at Meta before that.

In her inaugural announcement as CEO, in the midst of a lot of typical corporate speak, Asha laid out “three commitments” for Microsoft Gaming:

1. GREAT games
2. Return of Xbox 
3. Future of play

Interesting...

In regard to "GREAT games", all she really has to do is not fire good people, not close great studios, and keep the momentum they have going. 

Luckily, Matt Booty was promoted to Chief Content Officer, so hopefully he can keep the game train on the tracks for the foreseeable future (assuming he is allowed to do his job). 

In regard to the "future of play", it was already heading in a cloud-gaming / AI-augmented direction. Given Asha literally ran one of Microsoft’s AI products, I’m guessing they’ll be all-in on AI. Too early to tell exactly what that will mean for both games and gamers. While I think AI has the potential to augment human production and be useful, I don't typically see it used that way.

The second one is where my head is focused at the moment: “Return of Xbox”. What exactly does that mean?

Xbox is gone? Xbox is broken? Xbox is "visiting her sister" but will "be back soon"?

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying I don’t think there are a gazillion things wrong with Xbox, but I found it odd for the new CEO of Xbox to say it so directly (especially since I would wager that her bosses were instrumental in its current state).

"Return of Xbox" sounds nice as a sound bite, but I want to hear specifically WHAT she thinks is off track today and HOW she’s planning to “return” it. I don’t think she means Xbox returning to being a console-first platform with exclusive games. That ship has seemingly sailed from both a branding and a practical economic standpoint unless major changes are made.

I DO think it’s interesting, however, that she is CEO of "Microsoft Gaming", and not Xbox [whatever]. I can see how that distinction could allow MICROSOFT games to continue being multiplatform (which they need to do from an economic standpoint), while defining Xbox as a hardware brand first. Now whether Xbox remains a traditional “console” or becomes a range of gaming products, from handhelds to consoles to high-end gaming PC’s has yet to be seen, but I can see how that distinction opens the door to that possibility.

The bottom line is, unless Microsoft Gaming simply want to be a bigger version of Activision-Blizzard (that is - a mega third party game publisher across all platforms), you have to own the interface with the gamer. Companies like Nintendo and Sony do that through selling lots of hardware, and then they tie their digital game stores to that hardware. 

Xbox lost the hardware war a long time ago, but it also hasn't had a compelling hardware strategy in a long time, and their PC gaming position isn't any better.

Microsoft let Steam run away with the PC gaming market a long time ago, and now Steam is getting ready to launch a series of hardware devices which will allow gamers to use Steam outside of any Microsoft ecosystem (although many will likely choose to keep using PC).

So where does that leave Xbox? I don't really know, and honestly I don't think their new CEO does either.

But what do I HOPE for Xbox? I hope to see a return to glory. 

What does that look like?

It looks like Xbox having the most powerful console on the planet, and ensuring their first party games look better on their hardware than anywhere else. This doesn't have to be because they are purposing nerfing their games on other platforms, but because their developers have more time to perfect the games on Xbox hardware and have the inside scoop on how to extract the most performance from it.

The Xbox Series X was arguably the most powerful console when this current generation released, but not powerful enough. For most games, you can't tell the difference between the version for the Series X versus the PS5, and that's a problem for Xbox. 

Image from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0dWaA35VWQ

Now you might say, "but what about high end PCs?" I would argue this doesn't mean they need to try and beat high-end gaming PCs too. I still think console gamers and PC gamers are different breeds. 

Console gamers just want their games to look great and work well without all the constant upgrades and tweaking that PC gaming requires. Also, having a consistent hardware profile to design for and optimize games against is a huge help to deliver a great gaming experience. Sure PCs can scale up and down, but that delivers an uneven experience for gamers, even if it has the potential to outperform consoles.

Image from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HQwadK3aHo

This also means that Xbox needs to have a return to exclusives, from a console perspective, and even for PC it should have an exclusivity window where it stays console-only for a significant period of time (let's say six months to a year).

Nintendo will never launch its exclusives on other consoles, and its unlikely PlayStation will either. Sure some games could go multi-platform, but not their biggest hits. They both know the only way to maintain demand for their hardware is to have exclusive games people care about, and Xbox needs that too.

So where would that leave Xbox in the current Microsoft ecosystem? I think it needs to be separated from it.

I would argue Xbox should either be separated into a different division within Microsoft with its own leadership, outside of Microsoft Gaming, or at least it needs to be treated as a separate division within Microsoft Gaming, so it can chart its own destiny. Ideally I'd love to see Xbox spun off into a separate company altogether that Microsoft owns a stake in and has a long-term licensing agreement with, but that's probably too much to hope for.

From my perspective, Xbox doesn't need to be the biggest player in the games space, but it should be the best.

The best graphics and audio. Unique games that straddle the line between PC and console. The best online experience. All the things that made Xbox great in the beginning.

I believe they can do it. I believe they can return to their former glory and carve out a compelling niche for gamers that doesn't directly compete with either Nintendo or PlayStation, but the current path they are on isn't it.

So am I hopeful for the future of Xbox? Yes.

Do I think their new leadership structure will return Xbox to its former glory? Only time will tell.

God of War: Sons of Sparta - Buzz Breakdown

by Gamatroid 🕹️ 

 

Join young Kratos and Deimos, sons of Sparta, on a Greek odyssey as they discover the meaning of duty and honor. BEFORE THE LEGEND.

 

 GAME FACTS

• TITLE: God of War: Sons of Sparta
• RELEASE DATE: 2/12/2026
• MSRP: $29.99
• DEVELOPER: Mega Cat Studios
• PUBLISHER: Sony Interactive Entertainment
• PLATFORMS: PlayStation exclusive

 

In this prequel set during Kratos' harsh Spartan training, a fellow cadet goes missing, prompting the stoic elder brother Kratos and his brash younger sibling Deimos to venture into the dangerous lands of ancient Laconia to rescue him, forging their bond through trials of combat, puzzles, and mythical foes.

 

Gameplay unfolds as a 2D pixel-art action-adventure with Metroidvania elements across vibrant levels, where players control Kratos (and Deimos in local co-op) using spear-based attacks to battle diverse enemies and massive bosses; progression involves running, leaping, climbing, backtracking for abilities, solving environmental puzzles, and uncovering secrets, all while emphasizing Spartan duty in single-player or 1-2 player couch co-op.

 

RETRO ROOTS

God of War: Sons of Sparta taps into the pixelated side-scrolling legacy of the franchise's portable spin-offs like God of War: Ghost of Sparta and the mobile God of War: Betrayal, blending their brutal hack-and-slash with Metroidvania exploration akin to Castlevania: Symphony of the Night, Super Metroid, and modern pixel takes like Blasphemous or Dead Cells—trading epic 3D scale for tight, ability-gated 2D progression and boss rushes.

 

God of War Betrayal screenshot from MyAbandonware.com

BUZZ BREAKDOWN

 

Critical Consensus

 

Metacritic

• Critics: 75/100 (5 critics)
• Users: 7.2/10 (314 users)
• Notes: Lowest GOW; "Solid metroidvania, strong combat"

Opencritic

• Critics: 75/100 (6 critics)
• Notes: CG Magazine gave it 7.5/10

PlayStation Store

• User Rating: 4.7/5 (4.9k ratings)
• Notes: 87% gave 5 star rating; "fun combat, retro feel" 

 

Top Praises

• Fun, Punchy Combat: "Punchy and fun... skill trees with offensive/defensive moves"; DualSense haptics and upgrade systems shine.
• Tight Metroidvania Design: Strong level design, ability-gated backtracking, boss rushes; 5-10h with replayable secrets.
• Nostalgic Lore: Meaningful Deimos bond and Spartan origins; "stellar insight into Kratos' past."
• Retro Vibe: Chiptune-orchestral score, smooth PS5 performance; couch co-op nostalgia for fans.

Common Complaints

• Dull/Muddy Visuals: "Ugly and muddy... lacks inventive design"; pixel art feels basic.
• Floaty/Tame Combat: Predictable patterns, weak impacts, "lifeless" despite ideas—no brutal finishers.
• Co-op & Cohesion Issues: Spotty drop-in (campaign-locked?), progress bugs, "weak start" drags early hours.

Critic Highlights

• Positive: "Solid and well-crafted... strong combat and tight level design" (IGN Benelux, COGconnected).
• Mixed: "Dull combat but nice ideas" (GamesRadar+ in-progress); "weak start, strong ending" (XboxEra).
• Creator Clash: David Jaffe (after ~1hr): "Total crap... dumb, stupid... What were they thinking? Insult to the series." (Fans fire back: "If Jaffe hates it, it's good ").

Player Pulse (user rating feedback)

• 66% positive on Metacritic (rising); top PS reviews: "Best PS5 game... amazing haptic" and "extremely well done fan service."
• Massive early surge (750+ day 1 → 5K+): Raves for accessibility and nostalgia, though co-op refunds and QoL complaints (map, bugs) are bubbling.

 

Who is it for?

• Buy Full Price: GoW completionists hungry for prequel lore + Metroidvania fans (Blasphemous/Dead Cells crowd).
• Sale Pick-up: Retro platformer enthusiasts seeking a quick, nostalgic hit.
• Skip: 3D GoW purists craving bombast or Jaffe loyalists: revisit Ghost of Sparta remake instead.

Overall Verdict

 

A solid-but-safe 2D Metroidvania prequel that hooks GoW fans (PS Store soaring at 4.7/5 from 5K+) with punchy spear combat and young Kratos lore, yet critics peg it at a middling 75 on Metacritic amid muddy pixels and tame fights. GOW creator David Jaffe calls it "total crap". Players are split but mostly loving the retro vibe. A $30 nostalgic bite for diehards; snag on sale for everyone else.

 

 

You can watch the trailer in the YouTube video below:

 

Buzz Breakdown is a new feature I'm working on to provide perspective on games I don't plan on playing or reviewing personally. Sometimes that may be due to unfortunate timing. Other times it may be that I'm just not that excited about the game in question, or it may be a game's just "not for me", but others seem to enjoy. 

In the case of Sons of Sparta, I'm busy playing a bunch of other games I'm more excited about, and I had largely written it off after what I thought was a fairly lackluster trailer. Then given Jaffe's feedback I was even more certain I didn't want to play it, but then seeing the high user ratings on the PlayStation store I thought I should look into it a bit more. I'm still not convinced the game is for me, but clearly a lot of people are enjoying it. 

Additionally, I really enjoyed seeing Jaffe's take on it and I suggest you hear him explain his complaints directly, if you're interested. You can see his breakdown and commentary in the YouTube video below: